In a recent email from Network Solutions, it was clear they are putting in some time to balance out their use of text and images. See the screen grab below of ‘images disabled’ in gmail.

Notice the Following:

1. You can still see most of the key copy in a nicer format that traditional alt-text.

2.The Call Now at top almost looks like an image with the use of the black background and yellow font.

3. ‘Get Started Today’ at the bottom also provide the look of a button, which gives it an appearance improvement compared to a simple line of text.

HP had a fairly straight forward effort with a simple time-sensitive resend/reminder. A few comments:

Offer: Up to 50% off is enticing, especially for higher priced computer gear.

Overall Design: Fairly clean with clear focus on the offer.

Architecture: In this email, they didn’t feature any products, so HP had fewer click-through opportunities. With that, I would have expected this design effort to have a more prominent entry point. The ‘Shop HP Now’ is nice, but the focus on the promotion overpowers it a bit. I didn’t see any tests on this from them, but they very well could have been testing various elements.

Navigation: They provide additional entry points, which is great.

The Resend: With the screen grab on the right, we see their ‘last chance’ resend. While the design is consistent, there are a few improvements I would have liked to see: First, ‘Hurry Ends Soon’ is a nice addition but more time-sensitive copy could help. e.g. 24 hours left, last day, etc. I would have made this a bit more prominent as well. Additionally, I would have added an additional click-through element. The Shop HP Now button at bottom is nice, but having a clear entry point near the time-sensitive copy can help.

Here is the Rundown:

1. FISA requires consent where the CAN-SPAM Act in the US does not.

2. The new law defines consent as: Explicit – when the subscriber specifically provides permission to the sender (e.g. through an opt-in webform) and Implied: where there is an existing or non business relationship, such as a customer purchasing a product or service.

3. FISA applies to anyone sending to subscribers in Canada, not just companies based in Canada. (Hint: you should start segmenting your subscribers based on location if you are not doing so already)

4. Other key elements include the basics that you should already be implementing, such as company contact information on every email, a clear unsubscribe link or reply email, and timely processing of opt-out requests (within 10 days).

At the end of the day, everyone should naturally implement these practices. We want to provide relevant content to individuals who want to receive it, and provide a nice user experience with transparency. On a strategic note, the need to have better data for Canada subscribers may sound like a pain, but embrace it as it could create some very interesting segmenting opportunities.

On the topic of time of day, it can be interesting to take it a step further if you have the data available to you. If your ESP (email service provider) allows you to export and filter through email engagement data, create segments based on time range patterns. In a manual example, this would encompass opening up engagement data in Excel and filtering based on a time range for the given metric.

Side Note: The first instinct would be to filter based on time of open. While you should test this, you may find better results filtering based on time of click or conversion. You want to deploy to your subscribers when they are in a position to act. For more complex products/sales-cycles, this won’t apply as much. But for consumer retail products, it will be good to test.

In this example, you would see how many people (opened or clicked or converted) between 2-4pm, 4-6pm etc. This can get as granular as you have time for. Start slow though and test. Group the larger of the time windows you determine and test sending to them at that time with your next send. Make sure to document and monitor results so you can make informed decisions on testing allocation.

Testing can be fun, but it’s important to consider scale and resource availability. In a post from July 2009, we discussed this testing equilibrium in greater detail.

For time of day (or day of week) segmentation and testing, we ultimately want to provide a better experience to our subscribers. If we can do this, along with provide relevant content, we will increase the longevity of our subscriber relationships and provide stronger results to our email efforts.

In most of our studies, we see the open rate increase with shorter subject lines. Across a large sample, our highest open rates were with subjects that had fewer than 39 characters, but there are exceptions to the rule which makes it very important to test. In a post from early 2009, I wrote about A/B Subject Line Testing. While this plays an increasingly important role as your list size grows, it can also help to make big improvement for small senders.

Quick Tips for Subject Lines:

1. Be Cognizant of Inbox Restraints: some email clients will not display your entire subject, so make sure to have your key points at the front.

2. Focus on Targeted Copy: more important than the length is what your subject says. If it is timely and targeted you will see higher engagement rates.

3. Explore Dynamic Subjects: If your email platform supports dynamic content, experiment with using dynamic elements in your subject.

4. Test: The A/B approach helps increase your email funnel for each send and provide good data for future improvements. Take the extra step and test your subject lines.

The big win for Southwest is with their focus on email preferences. As we’ve discussed many times before, allowing your subscribers to select from a range of email options will be a win-win for everyone. Bronto had a good rundown of Do’s and Don’ts in this post.

Southwest started getting it right by having a very simple email sign-up and then making additional preference options available later. In the confirmation email they had the following call-out that was right to the point with great architecture and design.

On the landing page they had detailed preference options as follows:

Several nice things going on here:

1. They start off by giving you a great reason to fill out your preferences — so you can help them send you more relevant offers. Relevancy is key and becoming increasingly important.

2. Rapid Rewards: By asking for this, they should have access to detailed data on past purchase behavior which can be gold for segmentation.

3. Trip Related Preferences: They ask for items such as home airport and favorite destination, along with types of trips such as last minute vacations, business travel etc. This will provide Southwest with great information to further segment and provide relevant content.

4. Activity Related Preferences: Finally, they ask about activities you enjoy while traveling. This potentially takes their email program into another category by being able to provide partner offers, destination activity recommendations, and engaging content. I’ve seen Hotels.com and a few other related sites to this pretty well.

This is a great example of a company going the extra step to not only provide an email preference center, but one that is fairly detailed. Keep in mind though that this model would not be realistic for some smaller companies. By collecting these preferences they have the ability to provide some extremely targeted and relevant blow-dart like communications, but it creates the need for a more robust technical infrastructure and time-consuming content development. If done right, it can be gold — but make sure your foundation is ready to execute before implementing a detailed preference center. When in doubt, start smaller and scale up accordingly.

It has been a few weeks and nothing extremely targeted has come my way, but I’m looking forward to seeing what Southwest puts out and am excited to see how well they execute here.

Thoughts or questions? Feel free to leave a comment below or shoot me an email.

Cheers,

Forest

One area often overlooked is having a breakdown of your subscriber’s email domains. Knowing this information can be quite helpful when developing your creative. If you find a large portion on one domain, it may justify segmenting them and developing a separate creative optimized specifically for that domain.

Some email platforms will give you a quick graphic breakdown. If not, you can always do a sort in Excel and manually determine your ratios.

Below are breakdowns from 3 different clients I work with

Here we see some differing stats. In the 1st and 3rd example, Yahoo represents 5.6% at max, while the 2nd client has over 25% of subscribers with Yahoo addresses. We can also see that in the 3rd example at least 22% is represented by education or government addresses.

Looking at these three, I was surprised at the low amount of gmail addresses. We see 9.3% in the 2nd example, but none in the 1st and 3rd!

Takeaways

1. Every list will be different and it’s helpful to know how YOUR list breaks down

2. Knowing this breakdown will aid in testing your email creative on different domains. You should be testing on more than your breakdown, but this can provide priority.

3. If you find a large portion on one domain (25%+), it may justify putting resources into segmenting those users and providing creative optimized specifically for that domain. If you’re list is very small, this will be overkill.

4. Also consider segmenting by domain and testing deliverability. (Note – some email platforms will do this automatically).

Cheers,

Forest

Questions or inputs? Feel free to leave a comment or shoot me an email.

A client I work with manages hundreds of sites that collectively have thousands of service provider listings. Each service provider has a profile and we needed an efficient way to have them update their information, and notify them of their regional representative contact.

For this, we created a clean text-driven email with a bunch of personalization and some dynamic content. This allowed us to reach thousands of providers with the same email, and create an efficient system for getting updated information.

Below is a raw screen grab with filler content.

In the above example, there are several points of personalization and dynamic content:

1. First Name: Simple and easy

2. Organization Name: We of course want to personalize this with the name of their organization

3. Update Date: As a reminder, we included the date that they last updated their profile

4. Profile Link: This takes them to their specific profile

5. Info on Record: We have the Address, Phone and Email that is currently listed on their profile, plus a link to view the profile again to see the rest of the info

6. Edit Profile Link: To make changes, we have a link implemented that takes them directly to a page where they can submit updated information

7. Dynamic Content: We have a section for CSA contact information (their local representative) that we have dynamic rules set up for based on what product they fall under and their county. E.g. IF product=xyz and county=Los Angeles THEN CSA Contact = Jim Smith – jim@email.com

Below is the same screen grab with highlighted personalization elements.

A very simple email here creating a 1-to-1 communication and an efficient system. This email didn’t need flashy design, or excess copy — just personalized content and some top-level organization to make the process seamless. While the nature of this particular email is very specific, the concepts can apply to a broad range of initiatives. It’s very important to create a personalized experience with our subscribers, and with available technology email marketers should look at how they can better leverage their efforts.

Cheers,

Forest

Nothing has changed with the fact that testing should be implemented and will inevitably improve your email marketing efforts. I do feel, however, that there can be a risk of over-testing, or ‘testing burnout,’ if you will. This mostly comes down to available resources a company has and the expected return on marginal testing programs. If we put 10X more resources into testing and only realize an x% increase in sales, our testing program could be producing negative returns.

This has a more costly effect on smaller companies, as the scale of return is much smaller. [The marginal return from an x% increase in open or click rate is much larger for a big company with a list size of 5,000,000 vs. a small company with a list size of 5,000.]

For that small company, testing is indeed important. They need to make improvements to their email marketing efforts and increase sales just like every other company. But at some point a negative return is realized.

Example

• Let’s say a small e-commerce site selling backpacks has a list size of 15,000. Their monthly promotional email brings in $1,350 on average. [25% open, 12% click, 5% conversion, $60 average order]
• This company creates a testing plan that will require an additional 3 hours per month of company resources.
• After the test, they increase their metrics to: [28% open, 15% click, 5% conversion, $60 average order]. In this case we see a $540 increase in revenue. Perhaps a decent result for the small e-tailer. Their gross testing return was $180/hour.
• Now let’s say they create a testing plan that is more robust and requires an additional 30 hours of company resources each month. (compared to no testing)
• After the new testing program, they increase their metrics to: [30% open, 19% click, 6% conversion, $62 average order]. In this case we see an $1,830 increase in revenue. Their gross testing return was $61/hour. Depending on their margins and several other unknown factors, this may or may not be a profitable scenario

These same metrics with a big competitor would have a much different result. e.g. If another company had a list size of 750,000, their marginal return on the last scenario would be $91,530 with a $3,051/hour testing return. Probably quite favorable.

So where do you find that testing equilibrium? It comes down to the unique situation of each business. Regardless of size, start small with your testing program and work up from there. Pay close attention not only to the increased results of your tests, but the amount of resources that go into your various testing programs. Time for different content, designers, approval, segmentation, deployment, review & analysis etc, can add up when you are introducing complex testing strategies.

In the end, you should test to see what testing portfolio is optimal for your email efforts.

Cheers,

Forest Bronzan 

Questions or thoughts? Leave a comment or feel free to shoot me an email

There are of course several other elements besides the subject line that you can be testing. But first, a few things to keep in mind:

1. Why Test?: To get better results. If you are not testing, you are not fully leveraging the email channel and not getting the best return on your efforts. Testing allows us to make incremental improvements to our email metrics. Below is a simplified visual description of the email funnel, where every metric counts. In this example, an additional 3% click through rate would result in 28 additional sales.

2. Be Structured: select a variable to test and keep other variables as constants. You will want to isolate your variable in order to test each variable independently.

3. Create a Plan: Don’t just go in and start testing. Create a structured plan of how you are going to implement your tests and keep detailed records of metrics so you can use the data to make meaningful adjustments to your program.

Some Elements to Test

• Subject Line
• From Line
• Content
• Creative
• Number of Links
• Promotion
• HTML vs. Plain Text
• Frequency
• Time of Day
• Day of Week
• Pre-Header Content
• Text to Image Ratio
• Landing Pages
• Location of Images
• Personalization

With the availability of tools to help us execute our testing strategy, there is no reason email marketers should not have a testing plan in place. Proper testing can help us make key incremental improvements to our marketing programs. If you’re starting out, start small and simple and build up from there. If you are running a sophisticated program, make sure you have a road map in place and system for accountability and measurement.

Happy testing!

- Forest Bronzan | Follow Me on Twitter!

Questions or thoughts? Leave a comment or feel free to shoot me an email